In seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Europe, dance was far more than mere pastime; it functioned as an instrument of rule, a form of physical rhetoric, and a mirror of a strictly hierarchical social order. At the centre of this universe stood Louis XIV, the “Sun King”. He was not only the sovereign but primus inter pares on the dance floor, legitimising his political authority quite literally through physical presence and virtuoso mastery of the body.
The era of the Belle Danse (as the style was known at the time) closely coincides with Louis’s reign (1643–1715). During this period, dance underwent a fundamental transformation from courtly entertainment into an academic discipline. Louis XIV institutionalised the art form by founding the Académie Royale de Danse in 1661—preceding even the Academy of Sciences. This act underscores the immense significance attributed to dance: the bodies of the king and his courtiers became political symbols.
A technological quantum leap was achieved in this phase by the dance master Pierre Beauchamp. He developed a system capable of fixing ephemeral movement in permanent form. This system was later published by Raoul-Auger Feuillet, and is therefore known today as Beauchamp–Feuillet notation. This graphic abstraction made it possible, for the first time, to read choreographies like musical scores, to reproduce them, and to disseminate them across Europe. More than 350 such notated dances have survived—an invaluable archive of baroque movement culture.
Aesthetics and Sociology of Dance
Stylistically, baroque dance was characterised by strict geometry, vertical alignment, and a complex ornamentation of steps (such as the pas de bourrée or contretemps). The prevailing ideal was effortlessness in difficulty: dancers were required to combine the highest degree of technical precision with an almost mask-like composure. Dance masters acted as architects of the body. They taught not only steps, but an entire sociocultural habitus—posture, gesture, and the navigation of social space.
The ballroom was the site where social hierarchies were rendered visible and firmly entrenched. Anyone unable to “keep time” or to execute the intricate step sequences of the danses à deux risked social decline at court. Choreography thus became a reflection of state order: everyone had a fixed place, and every movement was regulated.
From the court of Versailles, this high-cultural practice diffused into the urban centres of Europe. The rising bourgeoisie adopted courtly manners, turning baroque dance into a pan-European phenomenon of the cultivated elite. The principles developed during this period—the outward rotation of the legs (en dehors), the five foot positions, and codified arm movements—continue to form the fundamental grammatical framework of classical ballet to this day.
In summary, baroque dance can be understood as the aesthetic condensation of an entire epoch. Through the obsession of Louis XIV and the analytical genius of masters such as Beauchamp, dance was elevated from an ephemeral pleasure to a “royal science”.
Yet to grasp baroque dance—its style, its development, and the complex role of the dance masters of the period—in truly profound depth, one must cast the net somewhat wider.
Style and Genesis
From Step Sequence to Flowing Motion
French baroque dance represents not merely a stylistic variation, but a fundamental rupture in the history of European dance. Whereas the Italian Renaissance style of the Quattrocento and Cinquecento still functioned in a largely additive manner—stringing together virtuoso individual steps—France developed an entirely new syntax of movement. The focus shifted away from the isolated feat of skill towards continuity, connection (liaison), and the hierarchical organisation of movement sequences.
As early as 1588, the seminal work Orchésographie by Thoinot Arbeau contains the embryonic elements of this development. Arbeau describes how elementary building blocks (mouvements and pas simples) are synthesised into complex structures known as pas composés. What remained largely theoretical in Arbeau’s treatise, however, was transformed into sumptuous practice under the reign of Louis XIII.
The Symbiosis of Bow Stroke and Dance Step
The decisive catalyst for this flowering was the institutional fusion of music and dance. From around 1620 onwards, the soundscape at the French court underwent a dramatic transformation: the renowned Vingt-quatre Violons du Roy (the Twenty-Four Violins of the King) established a new, rhythmically incisive style of performance. This sonic fabric was not mere accompaniment; it functioned as the metronome of choreographic development. During this period, the boundaries between musician and dancer were fluid, often effectively non-existent. A dance master was required to command the violin, for the phrasing of the bow stroke dictated the dynamics of the step.
The Beauchamp Dynasty
The talent that would later enable Pierre Beauchamp to revolutionise dance under Louis XIV did not emerge in isolation. He was the heir to a highly specialised dynasty. His uncle (also named Pierre) and his father, Louis Beauchamp, were both members of the Vingt-quatre Violons and served Louis XIII. Within this lineage, knowledge of the inseparable unity of acoustic and visual rhythm was refined and transmitted from one generation to the next.
Cultural Export: France as a Model
A key figure in the international dominance of the French style was Jacques Cordier, better known as “Bocan”. He embodied the archetype of the mobile, networked baroque artist. As a member of the Vingt-quatre Violons and a celebrated dance master, he is credited with the development of the baroque forms of the courante and the menuet—dances that would dominate European ballrooms for over a century.
Cordier functioned as a cultural diplomat. He taught no fewer than five queens and exported le goût français to the English court of Charles I as well as to various German princely courts. This marked the beginning of a cultural hegemony: long before French troops traversed Europe, French dance had already conquered England and Germany.
Early publications provide compelling evidence of this process. Johann Georg Pasch, for example, published instructional treatises in Germany as early as 1659 that explicitly promoted the French style, while Bray pursued a similar aim in England in 1699. Particularly striking is the early form of “branding”: in England, these complex movement forms were explicitly classified as “French Dances” in order to distinguish them from the more rustic indigenous “Country Dances”.
Conclusion: A Living Legacy
In conclusion, French baroque dance was far more than courtly etiquette; it constituted a highly complex system of bodily training, founded upon a perfectly structured symbiosis with music. Masters such as Beauchamp and Cordier were the architects of this system. Their legacy should not be understood sentimentally—it is technically tangible. Each time a plié is executed in classical ballet, or a courante sounds in a keyboard suite by Bach, we encounter the structural echo of this epoch.
Typology and Metamorphosis
From Etiquette to Spectacle
Baroque dance culture was not a monolithic entity but a dualistic world, strictly divided by function and space. On the one hand stood the ballroom as a site of social positioning; on the other, the stage as a realm of illusion and technical virtuosity.
The Ballroom: Dance as Social Ritual (Danse de Bal)
Within its social context, the dances commonly grouped under the term danses de bal served primarily to uphold courtly order. Dancing was not undertaken for mere enjoyment, but as a means of representing one’s social rank. A ball followed an uncompromising protocol: proceedings were often opened with the branle, a line dance that physically mapped the hierarchy of those present—always led by the royal couple. Only in the late eighteenth century was this ceremonial opening increasingly replaced by the majestic polonaise.
The core repertoire consisted of dances such as the courante, the bourrée, and above all the menuet. The latter was regarded as the “queen of dances” and staged a microcosmic drama of approach and retreat. It was performed using a refined terre-à-terre technique that avoided jumps altogether and, precisely for this reason, demanded the highest degree of continuous bodily control. As a counterpoint to this French strictness, the country dances (known in France as contredanses) eventually established themselves. They introduced a more democratic and geometrically simpler form into the ballroom, foregrounding social interaction among multiple couples and shared enjoyment.
The Stage: The Birth of the Professional (Danse de Théâtre)
In parallel, theatrical dance (danse de théâtre) developed as a technically far more demanding practice than the courtly repertoire. This was the domain of virtuosic leaps, complex turns, and the so-called grotesque dances, which portrayed comic or even demonic characters. A decisive turning point occurred in 1670, when Louis XIV withdrew from the stage altogether. Until that moment, the king himself had performed in the ballets de cour. His departure created a void that was subsequently filled by specialised professional dancers.
This development was institutionalised as early as 1671 with the opera Pomone. Dance had definitively become a profession. This transformation was accompanied by a significant gender shift: whereas female roles had long been danced by men en travestie (in women’s costume), from 1681 onwards women—led by pioneers such as Mademoiselle de La Fontaine in Le Triomphe de l’Amour—claimed the professional stage and profoundly altered aesthetic perception.
The Revolution of Expression: The End of Geometry
The notated sources preserved in Feuillet notation primarily document the geometrically oriented phase of baroque dance known as the Belle Danse. From around 1730 onwards, however, the demands placed upon dance changed fundamentally. As opera houses grew ever larger, the intricate footwork of the Belle Danse became barely legible from a distance. This was the moment for the reformers, foremost among them Jean-Georges Noverre.
Noverre rejected both pure virtuosity and the rigid masks of his predecessors, advocating instead the ballet d’action (narrative ballet). His aim was no longer purely aesthetic form, but profound emotional impact. The dancer was to tell a story through pantomime and expression, one capable of moving the audience to tears. This emotional turn also explains the gradual disappearance of dance notation: Noverre’s dramatic principles could scarcely be captured within the rigid symbols of Feuillet notation. While some technicians continued to rely on mass choreography, the dramatic principle ultimately prevailed, allowing ballet to emerge as an autonomous theatrical art, emancipated from opera.
Conclusion: A Divided Legacy
We thus view baroque dance today as a fascinating, divided legacy. On the one hand, we retain the cool, aristocratic elegance of the Belle Danse, which can be reconstructed with remarkable precision thanks to historical notation. On the other, we inherit the emotional force of the ballet d’action, which paved the way for modern narrative ballet and led dance away from geometry towards human expression.
The Domestication of the Ephemeral
The Art of Dance Notation
The history of dance notation is, at its core, a heroic attempt to wrest the ephemeral—the fleeting instant of movement—from transience and to translate it into a durable, transmissible form. Within the intellectual climate of the seventeenth century, characterised by a drive to systematise and catalogue the world, numerous scholars and practitioners sought a visual code capable of mapping the human body in space. Early pioneers such as the dance master Samuel Rudolph Behr had already developed rudimentary diagrammatic tables by the late seventeenth century, attempting to render the complexity of dance into a readable syntax. His aspiration to establish a method that transcended purely oral transmission reflects a new understanding of dance as an autonomous art form worthy of documentation.
During this period of artistic experimentation, leading figures such as Favier, Lorin, and Pierre Rameau explored divergent approaches to fixation. While Favier favoured a system adapted from principles of musical notation, others produced meticulously illustrated manuscripts that resembled pictorial documentation. The true paradigm shift, however, occurred with the introduction of what came to be known as Beauchamp–Feuillet notation. Published in 1700 by Raoul-Auger Feuillet under the title Chorégraphie—a term that at the time literally meant “the writing of dance”—this treatise rapidly established itself as the European gold standard.
The brilliance of Feuillet notation lay in its power of abstraction. A central line on the page marked the dancer’s path across the floor, while symbols arranged laterally conveyed precise information regarding steps, jumps, turns, and musical timing. This graphic elegance made it possible to capture the architectural structure of a choreography with mathematical precision. In order to make this complex and fascinating body of knowledge accessible once more to contemporary dance practice, I have consolidated my many years of pedagogical experience into a specialised primer.
This “Kleine Schriftkunde” (“Little Guide to Notation”) serves as a didactic bridge, rendering the cryptic symbols of the baroque era legible and experientially tangible for modern dancers and researchers alike.
With the advent of modernity and the technological transformations of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the demand arose for new systems capable of capturing not only floor patterns but also verticality and the dynamic qualities of modern dance. Highly complex methods emerged, such as Rudolf von Laban’s Labanotation or the Benesh Movement Notation, both of which remain in use within scholarly dance documentation today. Yet however precise these systems may be, in widespread practice they have largely been supplanted by the invention of video recording. Moving images can capture the visual essence of dance—its nuances and individual interpretation—with an immediacy no written system can fully achieve.
Nevertheless, the significance of historical dance notations remains undiminished. They are far more than mere instructional manuals for steps; they are cultural-historical documents that reveal the aesthetics, spatial concepts, and intellectual frameworks of past centuries. Even though video technology now dominates documentation, the study of baroque notation remains the only means of grasping the structural clarity and compositional logic of the Belle Danse in its original depth. In this way, these ancient signs continue to serve as a source of inspiration, enabling us to rekindle the magic of the Baroque in the present.
The Rhetoric of the Body
Affect and Expression in Dance
The world of baroque dance reveals a fascinating spectrum of expressive forms that extends far beyond the mere mastery of step sequences; it engages the entire body as an instrument of communication. It is a dance form of paradoxical nature: on the one hand, its clear structural principles allow for an accessible point of entry; on the other, its fully realised execution demands a remarkable degree of physical and intellectual immersion. Its enduring appeal lies in playful elegance combined with a profound choreographic rhetoric. According to baroque understanding, dance was a form of “mute eloquence,” in which every gesture and every turn was designed to represent and evoke specific affections—that is, human passions.
Within these choreographies, sophisticated step patterns merge with the ambition to depict the full spectrum of human experience. Baroque dance did not shy away from extremes: the portrayal of burning rage and deep despair found as much a place as the parodic character study of an intoxicated dancer. An outstanding example of this narrative richness is the so-called “Turkish Dance” (a testament to the period’s fascination with turquerie). Here, the protagonist, Pasha Suliman, attempts to impress his beloved through militaristic, drill-like movements. His clumsy and error-prone performance becomes a dramaturgical device: the supposed corrections of his mistakes culminate in highly complex, virtuosic leaps that demand considerable comic skill from the dancer. The charming parody performed by his beloved in her solo response, followed by a powerful and wildly energetic finale, demonstrates how dance could humorously reflect social dynamics and gender roles.
A striking contrast is offered by the monumental Passacaille from Jean-Baptiste Lully’s opera Armide. Here, playfulness gives way to existential gravity. In this form, built upon a repetitive bass pattern, anger and love fuse into a desperate struggle. The choreography renders the solo dancer almost as a plaything of her own emotions; she is tossed back and forth by musical waves, while her movements visualise the inner fragmentation of unfulfilled or tragic love. Such portrayals reveal that baroque dance constituted a form of psychological realism avant la lettre, long before modern theatre coined the term.
A serious engagement with these dances therefore requires far more than technical proficiency; it demands courage in expression and the intellectual ambition to commit fully to baroque aesthetics. One must be willing to be carried along by the intricate geometry and the intensity of the required expressivity. Only through such total immersion can the true beauty and vital energy of this art form be grasped. In an age in which dance techniques are often reduced to sheer athleticism, baroque dance retains its unique value as a homage to an era that celebrated the unity of mind, body, and emotion. Those who embark on this journey discover not only history, but also the powerful, timeless bond between music and human feeling.
The Democratization of the Ballroom
The Triumph of the Country Dances
n the historical development of baroque dance, the rise of English social dances—today known as Country Dances or Contredanses—marks a pivotal moment that permanently transformed the social dynamics of the ballroom. These forms originated in Tudor- and Stuart-era Britain. Although it is often recounted that Queen Elizabeth I already had a fondness for these lively formations, their cultural codification did not occur until 1651, when John Playford published his seminal work The English Dancing Master. This handbook was revolutionary: it recorded dances that had previously been transmitted orally in systematic textual form, making them accessible to a wider and increasingly aspirational social stratum.
A decisive turning point for continental European dance history came around 1680. A delegation led by the renowned dance master Mr. Isaac brought the secrets of this English dance art to the court of Louis XIV. The French court society—previously shaped by the rigid, often soloistic etiquette of the Belle Danse—was captivated by the new, interactive spatial geometry. Unlike hierarchical couple dances, the Country Dance, in its characteristic longways formation—two opposing lines of gentlemen and ladies—offered a social permeability that perfectly reflected the spirit of the age. From 1706 onwards, this enthusiasm was reinforced theoretically when Raoul-Auger Feuillet, and later André Lorin, developed detailed notation systems to capture the intricate floor patterns of English dances in precise baroque dance notation.
These dances conquered not only the magnificent royal residences, but also the public ballrooms and the private salons of both aristocracy and bourgeoisie. Particularly noteworthy is the early form of media dissemination: instructions for new Country Dances were often published in newspapers and periodicals. Like a precursor to the modern magazine column—or even contemporary fitness tutorials—these publications served as weekly updates for urban society. One learned the latest figures directly from the page, in order to impress at the next ball. This “medialisation” of dance played a crucial role in establishing a unified European taste in dance.
From the original English forms developed the Contredanses françaises in France, which emphasised the square formation and eventually paved the way for the 19th-century cotillon and quadrille. This evolution demonstrates the remarkable adaptability of the Country Dances to the prevailing cultural climate. Yet with the advent of the Biedermeier period and the unstoppable rise of the waltz, the star of these geometric group dances began to wane. The waltz replaced complex group interaction with the intimate closeness of the couple; the architectural elegance of the contredanse gave way to the dizzying rotation of the turn.
Although these dances are today often relegated to the dusty annals of history, their legacy remains alive in the structure of our modern social dances. They constitute the first documented evidence of a dance culture that combined elegance with communal participation, transforming Europe’s dance floors into a surging sea of calculated geometry and pure joie de vivre. In contemporary reconstructions of these choreographies, we can still feel the spirit of an era in which a single step was not merely movement, but a social message.
Pierre Beauchamp
The Architect of Movement
In the radiant aura of the Versailles court, where the arts functioned as a political manifesto of absolutism, one figure emerged whose influence would cement the foundations of classical dance for centuries to come: Pierre Beauchamp. Born in 1636, he belonged to the legendary Mazuel dynasty, a family of musicians and dance masters whose work had shaped French court culture across generations. His life path was no accident; it was the logical continuation of an artistic legacy, which he would elevate to unprecedented heights through unparalleled genius. At the tender age of eleven, he debuted in the Ballet du dérèglement des passions, astonishing the court with an almost ethereal lightness—a physicality that seemed to defy gravity and marked him early on as an extraordinary talent.
This exceptional virtuosity did not escape the notice of the young Louis XIV. The “Sun King,” himself a passionate dancer and athlete, appointed Beauchamp as his personal mentor. For over two decades, Beauchamp functioned as the monarch’s physical echo; they shared the stage, developed choreographies, and merged in a symbiotic relationship that ennobled dance as the highest form of statecraft. In this climate of constant artistic innovation, Beauchamp found ideal collaborators in Jean-Baptiste Lully and the dramatist Molière. Together, this triumvirate created the genre of the Comédie-Ballet, a hybrid art form that fused theatre, music, and dance into a satirical yet aesthetically elevated unity. Beauchamp’s genius lay in his ability to bring complex characters to life, not through words, but through the pure rhetoric of the body.
Yet Beauchamp’s historical significance extends far beyond the spotlight of theatrical productions. He was the first great analyst of movement. Legends tell that he even studied the fluttering of pigeons in the streets of Paris to understand the mechanics of flight and balance. From these observations and his years of practice, he distilled the essence of dance: he defined the five fundamental positions of the feet, which remain the inviolable alphabet of every ballet dancer worldwide. By codifying the en-dehors—the outward rotation of the legs—he created the anatomical foundation for the extraordinary freedom and virtuosity that characterises classical ballet.
The founding of the Académie Royale de Danse in 1661 marked the final transformation of dance from a chivalric exercise into an academic discipline. As its leading figure and royal choreographer, Beauchamp shaped a new generation of professionals. Under his leadership, dance emancipated itself from the strictures of courtly ceremony and opened to a wider public. A milestone of this development came in 1681, when, under Beauchamp’s direction, professional female dancers appeared for the first time on the stage of the Paris Opera, imbuing the previously male-dominated art form with an entirely new aesthetic dimension.
When Pierre Beauchamp passed away in 1705, he left behind far more than memories of fleeting performances. He had given dance a soul and a system. His spirit endures in the Beauchamp–Feuillet notation, which immortalised his name, and in every pirouette performed today on stages from Paris to New York. He was the visionary who recognised that true freedom in movement arises only through complete mastery of form. Beauchamp remains the brightest star in the baroque cosmos—a teacher whose lessons, even over three centuries later, have lost none of their brilliance or validity.
|
